header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / Carl Calvert
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Property
printer mail-detail

Weighing up the scale

How can practitioners navigate through the difficulties of enlarging maps, asks Carl Calvert

This case of judicial review brought by the Trail Riders’ Fellowship (TRF) in The Trail Riders’ Fellowship & Anor v R & Dorset County Council [2012] EWHC 2634 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 15 (Oct) concerned five routes over which the claimants maintained that the public enjoyed vehicular public rights of way which were not recorded on the definitive map statement (DMS). To add a right of way to the DMS an application has to be made to the surveying authority, usually the county council.

In this case the application to Dorset County Council  was made on a map which had its basis on an OS 1:50,000 scale map enlarged to 1:25,000. Regulation 2 of the Wildlife and Countryside (Definitive Maps and Statements) Regulations 1993 (SI 1993/12) (the 1993 Regulations) state that: “A definitive map shall be on a scale of not less than 1:25,000 but where the surveying authority wishes to show on a larger scale any particulars required to be shown on the map, in addition, an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll