header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

22 November 2019
Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil litigation
Bailey and others v GlaxoSmithKline [2019] EWCA Civ 1924, [2019] All ER (D) 65 (Nov)

In a group action by the claimants against the defendant pharmaceutical company concerning an antidepressant drug, Seroxat, alleged to be defective under s 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987, the Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimants appeal against a preliminary ruling of the Queen’s Bench Division. The appeal court ruled that the claimants had not been entitled to put their case on a risk/benefit basis at the start of the trial, as previous case management rulings had held that the case was to be based on ‘the worst in the class’ scenario basis.

Contempt of court
Jet 2 Holidays Ltd v Hughes and another [2019] EWCA Civ 1858, [2019] All ER (D) 66 (Nov)

A witness statement, verified by a statement of truth, made by a prospective claimant before the commencement of proceedings, in purported compliance with a pre-action protocol, could give rise to contempt and be the subject of an application for committal for contempt even though, following a challenge by the prospective

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll