header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014 / Deirdre MacNamara
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , Profession , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

The way forward?

Practitioners must take costs budgeting seriously, says Deirdre MacNamara

The new costs management regime imposed by Jackson has required immediate changes to be made to the way litigation is conducted for all practitioners.

Active involvement of courts

The court’s new powers lead to it being actively involved in the case from the outset. The parties are also required to be focused on costs at an early stage and engage with each other in an attempt to manage their cases, in view of the likely costs. The courts are now considering budgets in light of amended CPR 1.1, requiring cases to be dealt with “justly and at proportionate cost”.

Parties are expected to exchange detailed costs budgets early on. These budgets are open to scrutiny from the outset by both the court and any other party to the claim. It is likely that costs incurred in excess of agreed budgets may not be recovered on assessment, without good reason to justify the increase. It is, therefore, critical that practitioners who prepare these budgets are familiar with their case and are experienced in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll