header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Public , Property , Housing
printer mail-detail

Watching the clock

A recent appeal court case may prompt lenders to evict defaulting mortgagors sooner rather than later, says Sarah Greer

The recent Court of Appeal decision of Ashe v National Westminster Bank plc [2008] EWCA Civ 55, [2008] All ER (D) 128 (Feb) sent a collective shiver down the spines of mortgage providers already feeling the impact of the current credit crunch. Although Mummery LJ made it clear that the practical implications of the decision were “in danger of being exaggerated”, it will undoubtedly cause lenders to look again at their policies on obtaining possession of properties from defaulting mortgagors.

The Facts

In 1989, the Babais granted a second legal charge over their home in Stockport to the National Westminster Bank (the bank) to secure Mr Babai's liabilities on his accounts with the bank. There was already a first mortgage on the property with the Halifax. Under the terms of the agreement, the bank had an immediate right to possession of the property, and this was not restricted under the agreement or reliant on any default in payment by the mortgagors.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll