header-logo header-logo

15 August 2019 / Dr Owen Arthurs
Issue: 7853 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Wanted: radiology expert input

Dr Owen Arthurs examines the lack of expert radiologists in child protection cases

  • A national shortage of paediatric radiologists willing to engage in child abuse cases is compromising due process of law.
  • Active measures needed to change the culture and provide the best highly skilled experts available in a controversial area.

Cases relating to suspected child abuse are among the most sensitive and difficult cases that medical and legal professionals are required to deal with.

It is imperative that all parties—the children and their families, and the accused—have equal access to justice and due process. That process requires independent high-quality expert testimony on the medical evidence underpinning the legal case. In particular, expert evidence is often required in the criminal and family courts from paediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists, a relatively small pool of highly skilled and specialist radiologists. It is becoming increasingly difficult to find suitably experienced professionals to fulfil this important role.

Difficulty finding experts

Unfortunately, and for multiple reasons, the UK is currently facing a shortage of radiologists in general (10% vacancy rate across UK; RCR 2018 workforce

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll