header-logo header-logo

10 August 2012 / Lucinda Brown
Issue: 7526 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Walking a fine line

istock_000004137971medium_4

Lucinda Brown examines a charitable approach to litigation

To defend or not to defend? That is the question posed to charities facing claims against an estate of which they are a legatee. The decision is not a straightforward one. The trustees of the charity must balance the duty to ensure that the charity receives the monies that are due to it against the time, resources and costs that will be incurred in litigating to protect the legacy. Adverse publicity can act as a deterrent to charities who are considering defending claims as they seek to avoid the perception that their defence has caused the case to go to trial.

No special treatment

Charities are not given any preferential status by the court and legacies to charities are just as vulnerable as ordinary legacies in contested estates. Claims disputing the validity of wills, claims for rectification of wills and claims pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) can all give rise to the possibility that the legacy to the testator’s nominated charity will be eroded or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll