header-logo header-logo

09 December 2011 / David Renton
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Waging war

David Renton examines how disputes over immigration status affect unlawful deduction of wages claims

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Okuoimose v City Facilities [2011] UKEAT/0192/11/DA casts fresh light on the relationship between immigration status and employment law.

It has long been the law that where an employee has no right to work in the UK he cannot succeed in a claim of unfair dismissal. The employer’s defence has been widened recently, so that a dismissal may be fair even where the employer actually, but wrongly, believes that a worker does not have the right to work in the UK (Klusova v London Borough of Hounslow [2007] EWCA Civ 1127, [2007] All ER (D) 105 (Nov)).

The fairness or otherwise of such a dismissal will depend on the particular facts of the case, for example, how much enquiry did the employer make before dismissal? Did the employer give the employee every opportunity to show that its belief was wrong?

Kurumuth

In an important decision of the EAT in Kurumuth v NHS Trust North Middlesex University Hospital [2011] UKEAT/0524/10/CEA which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll