header-logo header-logo

07 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Virtual arbitration was a success during pandemic

Arbitration retained its popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic and adapted well to the change in circumstances, according to the 2021 international arbitration survey by Queen Mary University’s School of International Arbitration, conducted in partnership with global law firm White & Case

The survey, ‘Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World’, explored how the sector adapted to the unprecedented demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. More than 1,200 private practice lawyers, in-house counsel and arbitrators took part between October 2020 and March 2021.

Some 79% of respondents said they would choose a virtual hearing over postponement if an in-person hearing were not possible, while 16% would postpone and four per cent would opt for a documents-only award.

Nine out of ten of the respondents said international arbitration was their favoured option, either on a standalone basis (31%) or in conjunction with alternative dispute resolution (59%). The top five preferred seats for arbitration were London, Singapore, Hong Kong, Paris and Geneva.

The use of technology, already widely used in international arbitration, increased during the pandemic, particularly in regard to videoconferencing and digital hearing room technologies.

Respondents liked the greater availability of potential dates for hearings, when held virtually, as well as the greater efficiency through the use of technology and greater procedural and logistical flexibility. However, they expressed concerns about the difficulty of accommodating multiple time zones and the impression that it is ‘harder for counsel teams and clients to confer’ and to control witnesses and assess their credibility. They also cited screen fatigue and the fallibility of technology as concerns.

Post-pandemic, the respondents said they would prefer a mix of in-person and virtual for almost all interactions, including meetings and conferences. Wholly virtual formats were narrowly preferred for procedural hearings, but respondents wanted to keep the option of in-person hearings open for substantive matters.

Abby Cohen Smutny, global head of the international arbitration practice group, White & Case, said: ‘The field of international arbitration is dynamic by nature.

‘Its hallmarks of flexibility and party autonomy allow it to develop and adapt in response to the needs of its users. Recent times have seen an increased focus on drivers of change such as diversity, technology, environmental considerations and information security.

‘The COVID-19 pandemic has also presented challenges to the way in which the international arbitration community interacts, with virtual hearings, conferences and meetings with counsel, clients and teams becoming the norm almost overnight.’

View the full survey report at bit.ly/3b9fahH.   

Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll