header-logo header-logo

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victory for unpaid carers

The government acted unlawfully when failed to exempt unpaid carers for disabled family members from the benefits cap, the High Court has held.

In Hurley v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] EWHC 3382 (Admin), the court found that the secretary of state unjustifiably indirectly discriminated against unpaid carers, breaching their Art 14 rights under the European Convention on Human Rights by not considering the impact on disabled people.

To qualify for carer’s allowance, carers must provide upwards of 35 hours a week care to a severely disabled person who receives disability living allowance. The cared for person was given an exemption from the cap but the carer wasn’t. One of the claimants in the case became homeless as a result.

Rebekah Carrier, solicitor at Hopkin Murray Beskine, who acted for the claimants, says: “If [the claimants] are forced into stopping their important work as carers, the state will have to pick up the tab and arrange alternative care.”

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll