header-logo header-logo

03 December 2015
Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victory for unpaid carers

The government acted unlawfully when failed to exempt unpaid carers for disabled family members from the benefits cap, the High Court has held.

In Hurley v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] EWHC 3382 (Admin), the court found that the secretary of state unjustifiably indirectly discriminated against unpaid carers, breaching their Art 14 rights under the European Convention on Human Rights by not considering the impact on disabled people.

To qualify for carer’s allowance, carers must provide upwards of 35 hours a week care to a severely disabled person who receives disability living allowance. The cared for person was given an exemption from the cap but the carer wasn’t. One of the claimants in the case became homeless as a result.

Rebekah Carrier, solicitor at Hopkin Murray Beskine, who acted for the claimants, says: “If [the claimants] are forced into stopping their important work as carers, the state will have to pick up the tab and arrange alternative care.”

Issue: 7679 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll