header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Victory for open justice

Judges can grant public access to all written materials in the court bundle, the Supreme Court has held.

The case, Cape Intermediate Holdings v Dring [2019] UKSC 38, [2019] All ER (D) 161 (Jul), concerns the principle of ‘open justice’ and has wide-ranging implications for disclosure. Graham Dring, on behalf of the Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK, applied to access documents, which were due to be destroyed, from a legal case against asbestos manufacturer Cape. He believed they contained valuable information about the dangers of asbestos.

Giving the lead judgment, Lady Hale said: ‘The default position should be to grant access to documents placed before a judge and referred to by a party at trial unless there was a good reason not to do so. It should not be limited by what the judge has chosen to read.’

Harminder Bains, partner at law firm Leigh Day, who worked pro bono on the case, said: ‘This is a landmark decision for access to documents to non-parties and a victory for open justice.’

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll