header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Sarah Wood , Barnaby Hone , Gary Pons
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Crypto , Fraud , Cybercrime , Technology
printer mail-detail

Victims’ rights in the crypto age

241909
Gary Pons, Sarah Wood & Barnaby Hone consider the approach to cryptoassets under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
  • This article examines the variety of methods at the disposal of UK authorities under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to seize, detain or freeze, and recover or forfeit cryptoassets.
  • It also analyses the ways in which victims can make a claim for the return of their property within those schemes.

In late September 2025, Yadi Zhang pleaded guilty to an offence of money laundering involving 61,000 Bitcoin, which at that time was estimated to be worth more than £5bn. The seizure of the Bitcoin has been touted as one of the single largest cryptocurrency seizures in the world. The underlying criminality is the Lantian Gerui investment fraud involving about 128,000 Chinese victims.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) commenced civil recovery proceedings in respect of the seized Bitcoin under Pt 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) on 18 September 2024 in the High Court. It appears that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll