header-logo header-logo

29 September 2011 / Tim Suter
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

A very British institution?

Tim Suter traces the origins & achievements of public inquiries

“We have sought to establish the truth, insofar as it could be established.” The opening lines of the foreword to the report of the Rosemary Nelson Public Inquiry (HC 947) neatly encapsulate the overriding role of the modern public inquiry as a legal mechanism to investigate, examine, and report upon issues of grave public concern. Well-managed, a public inquiry can offer a cathartic opportunity that reassures public opinion and identifies lessons learned in the report upon its terms of reference.
The announcement of the Leveson Inquiry into issues arising from the News International phone hacking scandal highlights both how events and politics can suddenly combine to create the need for an inquiry and how little the public debate displays an understanding of the process, time, and money it will involve.

History matters

Public inquiry is a ubiquitous term that is applied to planning tribunals, investigations into transport accidents, and commissions on public policy reform.  

The modern public inquiry grew from the parliamentary tradition, through committees, of holding ministers to account for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll