header-logo header-logo

21 September 2012
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Case law , Tax , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Value Added Tax

Matthew Davies trading as Special Occasions/2XL Limos v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] UKUT 130 (TCC), [2012] All ER (D) 59 (Sep) Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Judge Howard Nowlan and Judge Greg Sinfield, 24 Apr 2012

If vehicles in question have been adapted so as to carry less than ten persons, that fact is fatal to any claim that the supplies of transport services with the vehicles in question should be zero-rated under the Value Added Tax Act 1994, Sch 8, Group 8 Item 4(a). It is immaterial that the vehicles might have been originally designed for the transportation of ten or more persons.

Nigel Gibbon of Northgate Company Services Ltd for the taxpayer. Ewan West (instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to Revenue and Customs) for the Revenue.

The Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VAT 1994), Sch 8, Group 8 Item 4(a) provided that zero rating applied to “transport of passengers… in any vehicle, ship or aircraft, designed or adapted to carry not less than 10 passengers”.

The taxpayer’s business supplied stretched limousines. All of the vehicles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll