header-logo header-logo

US Supreme Court: Dissenting adults

11 June 2021 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7936 / Categories: Features , International justice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
50769
Neil Parpworth provides a recent example of the US Supreme Court’s approach to the expression of dissent
  • Torres v Madrid: the facts; the legal issue; the authorities.

One of the means by which the success of a US presidency is sometimes determined is by having regard to the number of presidential nominees who have been installed in the Supreme Court during a president’s four-year tenure. Using this measure, Donald Trump’s presidency was a success in that three appointments to the highest court were secured, whereas Jimmy Carter’s presidency was a failure in that no new justices were appointed between 1977-1981.

However, given that justices are appointed for life, opportunities to appoint new members simply may not arise during a presidency so long as the incumbents remain fit and healthy and have no intention to retire. At the time of writing, six of the justices have been appointed under a Republican presidency and only three under a Democrat presidency. This imbalance is of course important given the nature of the legal issues which come before the Supreme Court,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll