header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Urgent review

The MoJ has been compelled to act on mortgage remedies, says Sarah Greer

The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ (CML) prediction for 2009 is that mortgage possessions will rise to about 75,000 by the end of the year. Of these repossessions, the CML expects “a sizeable share” to be buy-to-let borrowers, who have been particularly hard hit by the nervousness of lending institutions over the past months. In the current financial climate, attention has inevitably been focussed on the mechanics of gaining possession of and selling a mortgaged property where the mortgagor has defaulted on repayments. A recent High Court decision in Horsham Properties Group v Clark [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 58 (Oct) has caused such concern that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has started an urgent review into mortgage remedies, and how the law protects borrowers in mortgage arrears.

 

Background: possession and sale

It is well known that the lender has the right to take possession “as soon as the ink is dry” on the mortgage agreement (Four- Maids Ltd v Dudley Marshall (Properties) Ltd

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll