header-logo header-logo

16 September 2026
Issue: 8177 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Regulatory , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Urgent action needed on artificial intelligence risks

MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)

In a report published this week, the Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended the government create a single AI regulator ‘with the teeth to ensure enforcement’ and a regulatory regime covering the whole AI lifecycle.

Legislation should be enacted, imposing a due diligence obligation at all stages of design, development and deployment to prevent risk to human rights. Moreover, some uses of AI should be banned outright because they are incompatible with human rights, including subliminal techniques and inappropriate use of profiling or biometric data, the committee said.

Committee chair Alex Sobel MP said: ‘We need these protections now.’

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘Everyone including the legal profession requires clear guidance on AI. We need to know how the existing regulatory framework applies to data security, oversight, reserved legal activities and professional obligations.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll