header-logo header-logo

08 February 2013 / Simon Duncan
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Upsetting the balance

istock_000016468623medium_2

Liquidators can apply the hindsight principle when assessing whether a company is past the point of no return, reports Simon Duncan

Much has been written about the Court of Appeal’s decision in BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited v Eurosail UK 2007-3BL PLC [2011] EWCA Civ 227. The decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court and is listed to be heard from 25 February 2013.

Since the decision was handed down, lawyers representing liquidators of failed trading companies have encountered difficulty pursuing antecedent claims against the former directors (delinquent directors). This is because the delinquent directors have used the decision to argue that the impugned transactions were not effected at the “relevant time” as defined in s 240 (2) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986).

Section 240 (2) states: “Where a company enters into a transaction at an undervalue or gives a preference at a time mentioned in subs-s (1)(a) or (b), that time is not a relevant time for the purposes of s 238 or 239 unless the company—(a) is at that time unable to pay its debts within the meaning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll