header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Jamie Potter , Charles Brasted
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax
printer mail-detail

The upper hand?

When does the First-tier Tribunal have a supervisory jurisdiction, ask Charles Brasted & Jamie Potter

The search for the boundaries—and bases—of a supervisory jurisdiction in the First-tier Tribunal continues. The first foray was made by Sales J in Oxfam v HMRC [2009] EWHC 3078 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 326 (Nov) where he concluded that the basis for such a jurisdiction in the finance and tax chamber of the First-tier Tribunal (and its predecessors) could be found in certain sub-paras of s 83 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994.

Since that decision, in which Sales J himself recognised his observations were obiter, a number of First-tier Tribunal judges in the finance and tax chamber have accepted at least a limited supervisory jurisdiction. The tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal is yet to consider the issue, although, in December 2010, Mr Justice Warren, president of the tax and chancery chamber of the Upper Tribunal, sitting with Judge Avery Jones CBE as both the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal in a directions hearing, recognised that the issue of the First-tier

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll