header-logo header-logo

Update from the courts

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Christopher Russell discusses nervous shock and fraudulent claims

 

 
In Monk v Harrington [2008] EWHC 1879, [2008] All ER (D) 20 (Aug), George Leggatt QC, sitting in the Queen's Bench Division, concluded that Monk, who suffered psychiatric injury having rendered assistance to the victim of a construction accident, was not entitled to damages.

In January 2004, during the building of the new Wembley Stadium, a working platform fell 60 feet, killing one man and seriously injuring another. Monk went to the scene and tried to help both men. He subsequently developed symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and depression and was unable to work.

The issue at trial was whether or not Monk's claim fell within the claims of the class of persons entitled to damages for psychiatric injury caused by the admitted negligence of Harrington, Monk's employer.

Monk's claim was on two bases: first his involvement was such that he fulfilled the criteria to recover compensation as a rescuer and as such was a primary victim. Further, there was sufficient proximity to the accident for him to qualify as a primary victim because he asserted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll