header-logo header-logo

Update from the courts

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty discuss recent cases

In Levi v Levi [[2008] 2 P & CR D2 the deceased (D) had two children, I and S. D lived in a council property and applied to exercise her right to buy the property but died in 1989. Under her will D left “her share” in the property to I and her residuary estate to I and S equally.

I succeeded to his mother's council tenancy in 1992 and, exercising his right to buy, purchased the property for £41,250 in 1995. I could not raise a sufficient mortgage so he agreed with S that she would make him a loan, including allowing him to use funds from her share of the estate (I having already received his own 50%) to enable I to pay the balance of the purchase price (the 1995 Agreement). After the purchase there was an ongoing dispute between S and I about the terms of the 1995 Agreement, S's interest in the property and access to it. By September 1996 I had repaid all the sums due to S together with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll