header-logo header-logo

22 July 2010 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7427 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Unneccesary distress

family_11

Dorothea Gartland considers the high cost of child protection

The Court of Appeal decision in A v East Sussex County Council & Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2010] EWCA Civ 743 was handed down earlier this month (2 July). Mr Justice Hedley gave the judgment of the court, which concerned a claim for damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 by a mother whose child was removed from hospital by police using police protection powers.

The court gave permission to appeal but refused the appeal. Paragraph 21 sets out the position taken by the court: “Sadly the experiences of the appellant simply illustrate the truth that viable child protection procedures in any society will sometimes inflict what turns out to have been unnecessary distress on families. That does not make them or the exercise of them thereby unlawful.”

The facts

The 22-year-old mother had brought her two-month-old baby to hospital and told treating doctors that there had been two episodes where the child had stopped breathing. The child was kept in hospital from the 22 December until the 29 December last year and was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll