header-logo header-logo

07 November 2009
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Unmarried intestacy rights

Unmarried couples could receive the same rights on intestacy as spouses, if they have had a child together or have lived together continuously for more than five years.

Tens of thousands of people die intestate in the UK each year, creating financial and emotional difficulties for the families concerned.

In its consultation paper, Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death, published last week, the Law Commission proposed sweeping changes to inheritance and testacy law.

Where cohabiting couples have lived together for more than two but less than five years, the surviving partner would be entitled to half the share of the estate that a surviving spouse would have received. The cohabitant would receive nothing if the deceased was still married or in a civil partnership at the time of death.

However, the proposals fail to convince family law solicitor Christina Blacklaws, senior partner at Blacklaws Davis, who warns the proposals could be “unworkable”. “We have to ensure that any changes to the law are clear and fair,” she says. 

“For example, an unmarried partner without children would need to show that they had lived together ‘continuously’ for five years under the proposals to gain the same share of the deceased partner’s estate as a spouse. This is bound to lead to difficulties of proof, and with it possible challenge from other potential beneficiaries.”

The Law Commissioners also propose abolishing the current rule that children who are adopted after the death of a parent lose their right to inherit from that parent on turning 18.

Where there are no children, the commissioners proposed that the surviving spouse inherit the whole estate rather than, as currently happens, share everything over £450,000 with any surviving brothers and sisters.

The consultation period closes on 28 February 2010. A draft Bill is expected in late 2011.

 

Issue: 7392 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll