header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Jolyon Patten
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Insurance / reinsurance , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Unlawful conduct

Jolyon Patten explains why local authorities cannot act as insurers

In a landmark two-part judgment (Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council and others [2008] All ER (D) 226 (May)) which will have far-reaching implications for the insurance industry and for local authorities, the High Court has found that Brent LBC had no power to participate in London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML), a mutual insurer for London borough councils. It also found, in principle, that no local authority can participate in such a mutual if it does so to save money on its insurance. In additional (obiter) comments, the judge held that there might be circumstances in which a local authority could do so, but that there was no evidence that LAML could bring itself within those circumstances.

A second judgment in the same case addresses for the first time in the UK the so-called Teckal exemption to EU rules on public procurement. Here, it was found that Brent did not have the necessary control over LAML to bring itself within the exemption and accordingly was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll