header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008 / James Counsell
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

An unjustified windfall?

Should courts take into account events which take place after the notional date of trial in a claim for damages for professional negligence? James Counsell reports

In Hibbert Pownall & Newton v Whitehead (2008) EWCA Civ, [2008] All ER (D) 60, the Court of Appeal held that a firm of solicitors which was negligent in failing to conclude a mother's claim against a health authority for damages (for the wrongful birth of her son born with spina bifida) before the mother's death by suicide, was not liable to pay damages to the mother's estate for the child's care costs incurred after her death.

This important decision contains some useful reminders to personal injury and professional negligence practitioners of the difficulties of proving loss even when breach of duty is established. Of even more interest, perhaps, are the observations in the judgment of Lord Justice Laws as to the extent to which the court might be prepared to take into account unknown events which postdated the notional date of trial and which serve to reduce or possibly to increase the claimant's losses.

The Background
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll