header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Uniting family & civil

Can a Sch 1 (Children Act 1989) application and a TOLATA claim be consolidated or determined at the same time by the Family Court (in which the former has been made) or the County Court (in which the latter has been brought) where the same parties are involved in each case?

The proceedings cannot be consolidated. The Sch 1 application must be heard by a judge of the Family Court and the TOLATA claim by a judge of the County Court (unless in either case the claim is being heard in the High Court). They can be case managed and heard together, provided that the judge is able to sit as a judge of both courts. Many judges who sit in a combined Family/County Court centre will be able to do so, though where the TOLATA claim is proceeding under CPR Pt 7 and allocated to the multi-track, a district judge would need permission from their designated civil judge to deal with its final hearing. In the Central Family Court/PRFD a TOLATA claim may only be brought in the High Court, but a district

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll