header-logo header-logo

United action planned to fight legal aid reform

20 September 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Criminal lawyer groups have agreed to join forces and speak with one voice—led by the Law Society—when negotiating with the Legal Services Commission  (LSC) over legal aid reforms. The united action will kick off with a national demonstration on Monday 5 November.

In a statement the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Defence Solicitors Union, Association of Major London Criminal Law Firms and Independent Lawyers Group say they will be part of a single negotiating team with an agreed set of objectives.
“We want this to be a transparent process, and to ensure that there will be no separate bilateral meetings between any organisation and the LSC and government without the negotiating team being kept informed,” the group says.

The move comes after the LSC announced the determination of the general criminal contract, with new contracts to be dated from 14 January 2008 for a period of six months. There will be an invitation to express an interest and only firms that respond will be considered for a contract.

Contracts will be awarded if lawyers continue to meet the “contractual requirements” and accept all the changes but the contract will be for only a six-month period, to be followed by a move to the existing unified contract in July 2008.

A further consultation paper on best value tendering will be issued and the LSC’s final proposals on the graduated litigator fee scheme are yet to be announced. The LSC still intends to impose on 14 January 2008: fixed fees in the police station; graduated litigators fees in the Crown court (subject to the outcome of the consultation); a new very high cost cases panel; the routing of all calls via the defence solicitor call centre; and the expansion of Criminal Defence Service Direct.

The action group says: “Our associations have been informed by many of their owner members that they feel unable to continue to provide out of hours services in the police station due to the constraints of underfunding. Pending the regional and London meetings, and the advice of the Law Society, the professional associations urge you all not to take any steps to indicate interest in future contracting on unfair and uneconomic terms.”

The LSC says it is confident that the majority of firms will sign up to the new criminal contract in January, adding that if firms do not register for a new criminal contract their work will be reallocated to “other providers who have expressed an interest in expansion”.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll