header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Unitary challenges

How far do prerogative powers extend? Nicholas Dobson reports

In an outburst of good cheer, Samuel Johnson apparently once remarked that “when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully”. Literally speaking at least, there was no work for the hangman in the government’s announcement on 25 July 2007 that it would implement the nine proposals for unitary local government then specified, once the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill becomes law. However, some authorities did feel they had been hung out to dry in the whole process. And that feeling of twisting in the wind led to the legal challenges which came before Mr Justice Underhill in the Administrative Court on 10 October 2007 in Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Congleton Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2007] EWHC 2279 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 124 (Oct).

In addition to the substantive claimant authorities (Shrewsbury and Atcham and Congleton) a number of other authorities were interested parties as potentially affected by the unitary proposals. The claimants—both of which were liable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll