header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Union discriminated against female members

Legal news update

A trade union unlawfully discriminated against some of its female members when it opted not to pursue a better pay deal for them, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

The appeal court ruled in Allen v GMB, that GMB indirectly discriminated against female staff at Middlesbrough Borough Council when it recommended that members accept an equal pay deal, even though it undervalued the women’s claims. The union feared that if the women successfully claimed for the back pay they believed they were entitled to when compared with a group of predominantly male employees, it would threaten negotiations for pay rises for all its members.

Overturning an earlier judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the court held that the union had misrepresented to the women the nature of the deal which was on offer from their employers. Although the aim of securing a fair single status pay deal was legitimate, the court said, the way the union secured the deal was not done in a proportionate manner. The case will now return to the employment tribunal where compensation levels will be assessed.

Macfarlanes solicitor James Baker says: “This is extremely damning, and potentially very expensive, for the GMB. We can expect similar pay deals to come under the judicial microscope as a result.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll