header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Linda Lee
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Unhappy families

The LSC has narrowed the options for access to justice. Linda Lee explains why the profession must fight back

In late August the Law Society formally commenced judicial review proceedings of the Legal Services Commission’s (LSC’s) recent family tender exercise, which cut the number of firms able to do family law legal aid work from 2,400 to 1,300 and severely threatens access to justice.

The society was forced to take these steps because the LSC has brought about a situation where there is likely to be inadequate availability of lawyers for care proceedings, and where in future many people, including the victims of domestic violence, will be unable to find a lawyer close enough to them who is willing and able to take on their case. In addition, the clients of around 1,000 firms face serious disruption, and the LSC appears to have no measures in place to handle the transitional chaos.

The LSC still seems to be in denial about the severity of the implications for vulnerable clients, which has left them unable so far to come up with an adequate remedy for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll