header-logo header-logo

An unhappy coupling

01 May 2008 / Dr Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The FSA and Northern Rock - where did it go wrong? Dr Nicholas Ryder

Three weeks after its election victory, the new Labour government announced in May 1997 that work would begin on the reform of the Financial Services Act 1986. The government sought to implement a new financial regulatory regime which would set basic standards and prevent systematic failure. The proposals were contained in the Financial Services and Markets Bill 1998, which contained three important features:

·                                   

●     The creation of a single financial regulatory authority, which would have a clearly defined set of statutory objectives, functions and powers;

·                                   

●     the historic role of the Bank of England was to be revised; and

·                                   

●     the principle of self-regulation was to be abandoned.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) provided a single statutory framework for the Financial Services Authority (FSA). Under the Act, the FSA regulates and authorises members of the regulated sector which include banks, building societies, insurance companies, friendly societies, credit

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll