header-logo header-logo

Unfair selection?

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Opinion , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Helen Gill questions why the Equality Act exempts faith schools from its provisions

The decision in R(E) v JFS [2008] EWHC 1665 (Admin) has been championed as clarifying the meaning of race discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1977 (RRA 1976). However, would it be better regarded as a stark illustration of the limits of developing equality jurisprudence?

JFS is a school whose admissions policy prioritises children who are recognised as Jewish by the Office of the Chief Rabbi (OCR) of the United Congregation of the Commonwealth. E’s son, M, was denied admission to the school because M’s mother’s conversion to Orthodox Judaism was undertaken by an “independent progressive synagogue” rather than by a category of synagogue approved of by the OCR.

M was unable to attend the school, although he “is recognised as Jewish by the Reform synagogues of Great Britain and the Assembly of Masorti synagogues, practises his own Jewish faith, prays in Hebrew and attends synagogue and a Jewish youth group”. An atheist child of an atheist family (or a child whose family practised another religion) whose mother was once recognised by the OCR

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll