header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

An unfair divide?

Here’s a disquieting thought as we approach the brave new liberalised legal services world...

Some 80% of the work undertaken by law firms falls within the category of “non-reserved” legal work...in other words, anyone (not just lawyers) can do it.

The figure was arrived at by Professor Stephen Mayson, the legal academic who came up with the memorable and equally alarming finding that as many as 3,000 law firms could go to the wall as a result of the reforms flowing from the Legal Services Act 2007.

More questions than answers?

Well, the following questions spring to mind: Despite all the fuss in the legal press, what’s the point in new market entrants becoming alternative business structures next October if most of their business doesn’t actually need to be regulated? What’s the point in employing lawyers to do the kind of work which non-lawyers can do and, frankly, what’s the point in becoming a lawyer at all?

This is the first in a series of three articles looking at the six reserved legal activities found under the Legal Services Act 2007 and,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll