header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal—Constructive dismissal—Damages

Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58, [2011] All ER (D) 101 (Dec)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 14 Dec 2011

The reasoning in Johnson v Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13, [2001] 2 All ER 801 applies so as to preclude recovery of damages for loss arising from the unfair manner of a dismissal in breach of an express term of an employment contract.

Mark Sutton QC and Marcus Pilgerstorfer (instructed by DAC Beachcroft LLP) for the first appellant. Wendy Outhwaite QC (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the second appellant. Mary O’Rourke QC and Oliver Williamson (instructed by Ryan Solicitors) for the first respondent. Frederic Reynold QC and Philip Mead (instructed by Dean Wilson LLP) for the second respondent.

The respondents had been dismissed by the appellants, their respective employers, following allegations of misconduct. Both respondents issued claims in the High Court for damages for breach of their contracts of employment. In the case of the first respondent,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll