header-logo header-logo

*Partner copy* Unexpected results: street drug contamination and poly drug use

09 January 2026 / Marie Law
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Family , Health
printer mail-detail
239530

As a leading provider of legally-instructed drug testing, we are frequently asked to explain how a sample donor could test positive for a substance they claim never to have used.

These queries are increasingly common, particularly in family law cases where drug testing is used to assess parenting capacity, monitor abstinence, or confirm compliance with court orders.

Legal professionals may receive a toxicology report showing one or more drugs not disclosed by the donor and not anticipated at instruction. While the accuracy of the analysis is not in question, such results can raise serious concerns – especially where the donor’s denial appears credible.

The illicit drug market is increasingly characterised by contamination and deliberate mixing of substances. Users are often unaware that what they are taking has been cut with, substituted for, or combined with other drugs, some of which are significantly more potent or harmful.

This means that, in some cases, a toxicology report may show the presence of drugs the donor did not knowingly consume.

What is poly drug use?

Poly drug use refers to the use of two or more substances within a given timeframe. This may be deliberate – to enhance or moderate effects – or unintentional, where a drug has been contaminated or mis-sold.

Some combinations have street names. ‘Calvin Klein’ (or CK), for example, refers to the concurrent use of cocaine and ketamine.

With no regulation or quality control in illicit drug manufacturing, substances are routinely cut or laced with others to increase profit margins or intensify effects.

At AlphaBiolabs, we have seen a rise in samples testing positive for multiple drug groups. For family law professionals, this highlights the importance of instructing comprehensive toxicology testing, including screening beyond standard panels, particularly where behaviours or symptoms cannot be explained by a single substance.

How are street drugs contaminated?

Illicit drugs are often adulterated with other drugs, masking agents or bulking agents such as sugars. Of growing concern is the rise of synthetic opioids, particularly nitazenes, in the UK drug supply.

In 2022, the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) reported that over 25% of cocaine samples and more than 50% of heroin/diamorphine samples seized in the UK contained isotonitazene, a powerful nitazene analogue. Separately, Public Health Scotland has linked another nitazene, ‘Pyro’ (N-pyrrolidino etonitazene), to a sharp rise in drug-related deaths across Scotland (August 2025).

In such cases, a positive test result may reflect contamination rather than deliberate use – a distinction with significant legal implications.

One such example at AlphaBiolabs involved a donor (Mr X) whose hair sample tested positive for five substances: THC, cocaine, norcocaine, benzoylecgonine, and ketamine.

While Mr X accepted the presence of the other substances, he strongly denied taking ketamine, saying:

“I haven’t even seen ketamine. I don’t know anyone who uses it, or even how to use it. I would not be able to get it if I tried – I don’t have a horse, and I’m not a vet!”

How AlphaBiolabs can support your case

AlphaBiolabs is an award-winning, UKAS 17025 and Lab 51-accredited laboratory with 20+ years’ experience supporting family law professionals, social workers and local authorities.

We provide legally-admissible drug and alcohol testing using a range of sample types, including hair, nails, blood, oral fluid, urine, and breath, with bespoke repeat testing schedules available.

We also test for the widest range of substances including the most-abused drugs as well as ‘non-standard’ drugs e.g. steroids, prescription medications, hallucinogens, nitazenes, other emerging synthetic opioids. Custom testing panels can be created to suit your case.

And with our Price Promise, where we will beat any like-for-like quote by a further 10%, you know that you are guaranteed to get the best value for money.

To request a quote, contact our New Enquiry team on 0333 600 1300 / testing@alphabiolabs.com or complete our online quote form www.alphabiolabs.co.uk/legal-test-forms/.

 


 

Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
A highly-skilled and respected scientist with over 15 years’ experience in the field of forensics, Marie joined AlphaBiolabs in 2022 and oversees the company’s growing toxicology team.
As Director of Toxicology, Marie’s day-to-day responsibilities include maintaining the highest quality testing standards for toxicology and further enhancing AlphaBiolabs’ drug and alcohol testing services for the legal sector, members of the public, and the workplace sector.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll