header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Unequal victims

Pleural plaque sufferers deserve better justice than a UK postal lottery, says Richard Scorer

Pleural plaques are a scarring on the lung caused by exposure to asbestos. Although they can often be a precursor to more serious asbestos related illnesses, for example mesothelioma, they are distinctive from other types of asbestos related conditions in that they are usually symptom free. The person afflicted by pleural plaques will not experience any physical pain or suffering, and in many cases will never become ill at all. However, the person afflicted may become very anxious about the possibility of developing asbestos related disease in the future, so psychological harm may be caused (see 159 NLJ 7396, p 1688 for the previous article on pleural plaques).

This gives rise to a legal problem: where the inhalation of asbestos fibres giving rise to pleural plaques is a result of negligence, eg by an employer, should persons suffering from pleural plaques be entitled to damages in the civil courts? In 2007 the House of Lords decided that, since no actual physical pain and suffering is caused by the condition, pleural plaques cannot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll