header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Unequal victims

Pleural plaque sufferers deserve better justice than a UK postal lottery, says Richard Scorer

Pleural plaques are a scarring on the lung caused by exposure to asbestos. Although they can often be a precursor to more serious asbestos related illnesses, for example mesothelioma, they are distinctive from other types of asbestos related conditions in that they are usually symptom free. The person afflicted by pleural plaques will not experience any physical pain or suffering, and in many cases will never become ill at all. However, the person afflicted may become very anxious about the possibility of developing asbestos related disease in the future, so psychological harm may be caused (see 159 NLJ 7396, p 1688 for the previous article on pleural plaques).

This gives rise to a legal problem: where the inhalation of asbestos fibres giving rise to pleural plaques is a result of negligence, eg by an employer, should persons suffering from pleural plaques be entitled to damages in the civil courts? In 2007 the House of Lords decided that, since no actual physical pain and suffering is caused by the condition, pleural plaques cannot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll