header-logo header-logo

03 March 2011 / Nichola Evans
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Under review

Nichola Evans investigates the reign of uncertainty surrounding success fees

While interested parties have been busy preparing their responses to the government Green Paper on civil costs, the courts have themselves been reviewing the question of success fees. Two cases, one decided in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the other in the Technology and Construction Court, contain heavy criticism of the current system and pose a number of issues for both claimants and defendants who operate in the “no win, no fee” arena.

MGN v United Kingdom (Case No 39401/04)

This is a case which has already garnered a considerable degree of media attention over the past few years.

The claim dates back to 2001 after the Daily Mirror newspaper revealed that the supermodel Naomi Campbell was receiving treatment for drug abuse. Proceedings were brought by Ms Campbell against the Mirror Group which concerned the primary issue as to whether or not that by publishing its story, MGN Limited breached the privacy of Naomi Campbell.  

In the High Court and in the Court of Appeal Ms Campbell’s solicitors acted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll