header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Under one roof

Geraldine Morris looks at the implications of the Civil Partnership Act 2004

Family practitioners are generally aware that the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) introduced provisions in relation to dissolution, nullity and separation orders largely equivalent to those set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) regarding divorce, nullity and judicial separation. Equally, the provisions of the CPA 2004 regarding financial provision correspond with those for divorcing spouses under MCA 1973.

CPA 2004 is, however, a carefully drafted and comprehensive piece of legislation. It includes provisions in relation to remedies corresponding to those available to divorcing spouses under other legislation. In addition, although CPA 2004 has been in force since 2005, the lack of reported case law relating to civil partnership has led to a lack of up-to-date current awareness of civil partnership and the impact that reported divorce proceedings or different sex cohabitant cases may have upon civil partnership dissolution, ancillary relief and non civil partnership same sex relationships. Some of the areas where there are corresponding or comparable provisions which could be overlooked by practitioners are set out below.
Bankruptcy

Section 366

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll