header-logo header-logo

13 August 2021 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7945 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Expert witness: Under (the wrong) contract?

54944
Mark Solon addresses some common issues when drawing up terms & conditions for experts
  • Outlines how to minimise risks when drawing up contracts between expert and solicitor.

Over the years, Bond Solon has conducted many surveys about the work of expert witnesses and a perennial problem has been the terms of engagement between an instructing solicitor and an expert witness. Let’s look at some of the clauses the solicitor should consider.

Fees & payment

Most problems between an expert and a solicitor are in the area of fees so it is best to have a clear agreement before work commences on how much the expert will be paid, for what services and when payment will happen. In many instances the expert will charge an agreed hourly rate for the work done, but there should also be clarity on expenses such as accommodation and travel and other expenses if these are involved and also if VAT is to be added. Sometimes there is a fixed fee and here it is important there is clarity on what that fee covers. Be clear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll