header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / David Lock
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Unconventional?

David Lock examines Human Rights Act claims & the doctrine of precedent

Every law student learns how the theory of precedent works in practice. Statute law has supreme authority, but after that the House of Lords, or now the Supreme Court, binds the Court of Appeal; the Court of Appeal binds the High Court.

Precedent is ageless. It does not matter how long ago the Court of Appeal pronounced on a matter; no High Court judge can overturn that decision until it is distinguished by another Court of Appeal or overturned by the Supreme Court. But what happens if a lower court has to wrestle with a Human Rights Act 1998 point which has not been raised in previous cases?

Public bodies

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) s 6 provides that all public bodies are required to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). Judges are public bodies for these purposes. Hence judges are required by an Act of Parliament to produce judgments which comply with the Convention. If there is a conflict, which way should a judge turn if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll