Absurd circumstances are a daily occurrence at the coalface of employment law, says Ian Smith
“A worker (admittedly not an employee) who had been investigated for misconduct following a police investigation claimed that he had been victimised because he had blown the whistle on a third party, but before these matters could come to a head he was made redundant under a procedure operating partly on LIFO. Discuss.”
One of the beauties of lecturing employment law is that you do not have to make up daft examples for illustrations or exam questions; they tend to arise naturally. In the fine tradition of academic exaggeration, the above facts did not occur this month in one case, but in four. However, we must never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
Redrow Homes: the continuing tale
Readers will recall that the case of Redrow Homes (Yorkshire) Ltd v Wright [2004] IRLR 720, [2004] 3 All ER 98 was one of those that emphasised that the “worker” definition in the Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) (the Regulations) reg 2 can apply to many people who
