header-logo header-logo

12 July 2018
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Legal News , Technology
printer mail-detail

UK playing technological catch-up

UK legal departments are slower than their US counterparts to embrace technological innovations, a survey shows.

More than 2,000 senior in-house counsel were surveyed about a range of technologies by market researchers Acritas.

The results showed a quarter of UK legal departments were not using any of the technologies investigated, compared to 11% in the US. Overall, UK in-house counsel were less likely than those in the US to be using every technology mentioned in the survey.

E-signatures, for example, were used by 61% of US legal departments compared to 49% of Mainland European and 37% of UK legal departments.

Lisa Hart Shepherd, CEO at Acritas, said: ‘We expected the US to lead on the use of litigation related technologies, but the UK is using less of everything we tested.’

Issue: 7801 / Categories: Legal News , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll