header-logo header-logo

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tweet tweet, say lawyers

Time to take a strategic approach to social media

The legal Twitterati and LinkedIn users lead the social media field among lawyers, a report shows.

Both sites were rated highest in terms of influence and effectiveness by law firms and chambers surveyed by NLJ in association with legal PR consultancy Kysen. They were followed by Facebook and Instagram, while other platforms flagged up included Pinterest, Google+, WeChat, Snapchat and Paper.li, a content curation service.

Respondents also highlighted legal platform Juriosity, which offers a knowledge network and professional directory.

Catherine Calder, joint CEO of Serjeants’ Inn Chambers and co-chair of the Legal Practice Management Association, said: ‘It is the new shop window.

‘Previously, the news page on our website was our key platform for knowledge-sharing and announcing chambers’ developments. Now we push everything out via social media.

‘It is clear from both the engagement statistics and from anecdotal evidence that that this is how we are reaching clients and contacts.’

However, different platforms have different uses, she said. While Twitter helps law firms and chambers connect with students, pupils and legal commentators, LinkedIn is a better platform for clients, with posts ‘leading directly to new work’.

The report advises taking a strategic approach to social media, as would be the case with any other communications. For example, they should ‘think logically through who your target audiences are and what you need to be saying to them to achieve your aims’, according to Fred Banning, head of corporate communications at Pinsent Mason. Combining press coverage in the still-powerful traditional press with social media activity to push the message out works very well.

There are also risks—innocent-seeming posts can go spectacularly wrong; hastily typed out tweets can go viral. The survey found that some firms are closing their Twitter accounts or tightening up their monitoring and setting clear policies so staff are accountable.

The full report, written by journalist Grania Langdon-Down, is published by NLJ this week, and available as a PDF below.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll