header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Joe Mcmanus
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Damages
printer mail-detail

Turning the tables?

Ogden 6—are they making a difference in assessing PI claims? asks Joe McManus

The Ogden Tables are designed to assist in the more accurate calculation of future loss in personal injury claims. The sixth edition of the Ogden Tables (Ogden 6) published in May 2008 introduces some signifi cant changes, particularly as regards the calculation of contingencies other than mortality.

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of the changes for residual loss of earnings that the biggest change has taken place.

Under the old tables, the determining factors in calculating the discount to apply to multipliers were: occupation; economic activity; and geographical locations. These have been replaced and Ogden 6 discounts are now based on educational achievement, employment status and whether or not someone is disabled. (Table B in the sixth edition sets out the discounts which apply to disabled people up to the age of 54).

Ogden 6 confirms that we are all living a little longer; however, it is in respect of the changes for residual loss of earnings that the biggest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll