header-logo header-logo

29 January 2010 / John McMullen
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

Part 1: Consulting on redundancy & TUPE transfers by Dr John McMullen

Recent months have seen a number of interesting cases on information to and consultation with employee representatives, both in the context of multiple redundancies and transfer of undertakings (TUPE). All of them pose challenges in their application and scope. This is the first of two articles noting these developments.

The timing of consultation

Under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992,
s 188 (as amended) an employer proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees of one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, must consult about the dismissals with the appropriate representatives of any of the employees affected by the proposed dismissals, or who may be affected by measures taken in connection with those dismissals.

“Proposal” to dismiss has widely been regarded as something approaching, albeit preceding, a decision to dismiss. Under ageing UK case law this narrow view of “proposing” would mean that consultation does not have to begin until a fairly advanced stage of the exercise. However, the EC “Collective Redundancies” Directive 98/50,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll