header-logo header-logo

29 January 2010 / John McMullen
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE or not TUPE

Part 1: Consulting on redundancy & TUPE transfers by Dr John McMullen

Recent months have seen a number of interesting cases on information to and consultation with employee representatives, both in the context of multiple redundancies and transfer of undertakings (TUPE). All of them pose challenges in their application and scope. This is the first of two articles noting these developments.

The timing of consultation

Under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992,
s 188 (as amended) an employer proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees of one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, must consult about the dismissals with the appropriate representatives of any of the employees affected by the proposed dismissals, or who may be affected by measures taken in connection with those dismissals.

“Proposal” to dismiss has widely been regarded as something approaching, albeit preceding, a decision to dismiss. Under ageing UK case law this narrow view of “proposing” would mean that consultation does not have to begin until a fairly advanced stage of the exercise. However, the EC “Collective Redundancies” Directive 98/50,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll