header-logo header-logo

02 April 2009
Issue: 7363 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-detail

TUPE bites law firm

Employment

 TUPE has been found to apply to solicitors firms, in the first case of its kind.
An employment tribunal ruled The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulations applied where Southport firm Barnetts solicitors won a contract to do conveyancing from the Britannia Building Society. Six Lees Lloyd Whitley solicitors and support staff, who had worked on the Britannia contract, resigned when Barnetts took over the contract. They claimed Barnetts had repudiated their contracts.

In Royden v Barnetts, Barnetts argued that TUPE did not apply. The tribunal, however, unanimously held that two of Lees Lloyd Whitley’s employees had transferred.

The tribunal found Barnetts had unfairly dismissed two of the employees, and had failed in their duty to consult.

Issue: 7363 / Categories: Legal News , TUPE
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll