header-logo header-logo

12 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trust wins discrimination appeal

No unlawful discrimination took place when an NHS Trust disciplined a Christian employee for improperly promoting her religious beliefs.

Wasteney v East London NHS Trust (App No. UKEAT/0157/15/LA) concerned the Trust’s action after receiving complaints against Wasteney of religious “grooming” from a more junior employee of Muslim faith. The alleged “grooming” consisted of “praying with the junior worker and the laying on of hands, giving a book to that worker, which concerned the conversion to Christianity of a Muslim woman, and inviting her to various services and events at the claimant’s church”. After investigation, the Trust found Wasteney guilty of serious misconduct, namely the blurring of professional boundaries and the subjection of a junior colleague to improper pressure and unwanted conduct. She was given a final written warning, reduced on appeal to a first written warning.

Judge Eady QC dismissed the appeal, stating in her judgment that: “The claimant was not subjected to disciplinary process or sanction because she manifested her religious belief in voluntary and consensual exchanges with a colleague but because—as the employment tribunal expressly found—she subjected a subordinate to unwanted and unwelcome conduct, going substantially beyond ‘religious discussion’, without regard to her own influential position. 

“The treatment of which the claimant complained was because of, and related to, those inappropriate actions; not any legitimate manifestation of her belief.” 

Employment law specialist Dr John McMullen, a partner at Wrigleys, says: "This case confirms that everyone has the right to manifest their religion and that to discipline someone for doing so would be unlawful discrimination. 

“However an employer would be entitled to discipline someone for subjecting (as in this case) a junior colleague to unwanted pressure and unwelcome conduct by foisting their religion on them. The right to manifest one's religion can include an element of proselytization but an employer is entitled to take reasonable action to protect the rights of another person who simply does not want to give up their own religion."

Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll