header-logo header-logo

13 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trust & trustee

Agarwala v Agarwala [2016] EWCA Civ 1252, [2016] All ER (D) 86 (Dec)

 

The Court of Appeal allowed part of an appeal against two orders in which the respondent, JA, had been ordered to pay compensation for loss of profits to her claimant brother-in-law, SA, in respect of a property for which JA was a bare trustee, but SA was the beneficial owner. The court allowed the appeal to the limited extent that the judge had erred in awarding equitable compensation by reference to notional profit, rather than an account of the actual profits made following the point at which JA had lawfully been in possession of the property.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll