header-logo header-logo

27 July 2012
Issue: 7524 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trust and trustee—Removal of trustee of religious trust—Jurisdiction

Shergill and others v Khaira and others [2012] EWCA Civ 983, [2012] All ER (D) 167 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Hooper and Pitchford LJJ, 17 Jul 2012

The authorities establish that the courts abstain from adjudicating on the truth, merits or sincerity of differences in religious doctrine or belief and on the correctness or accuracy of religious practice, custom or tradition.

Robert Pearce QC (instructed by Ford & Warren, Leeds) for the claimants. Mark Hill QC and JK Quirke (instructed by Seymours Solicitors LLP) for the defendants.

The parties were members of the Sikh religious community. Most either were or had been trustees of one or other of two Gurdwaras used by the community as meeting places for religious worship. The Gurdwaras were in Birmingham and High Wycombe, and they were founded in the 1980s by the First Holy Saint of the Nirmal Sikhs. The Gurdwaras were subject to trust deeds (the trust deeds). The trust deeds conferred on the First Holy Saint “or his successor” a power to remove and replace trustees.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll