header-logo header-logo

14 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trump & the Supreme Court

President-elect Trump is likely to have an opportunity to fill four vacancies in the US Supreme Court during his term in office.

And, unlike President Obama, he can expect to find his nominees endorsed by a Senate controlled by his own Republican party, Geoffrey Bindman QC writes in this week’s NLJ. Once appointed, Supreme Court justices are there for life or until voluntary retirement.

Following the death of Antonin Scalia, a conservative, in February, President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, a moderate liberal. However, the Senate deferred the confirmation process pending the election, therefore it will be Trump who makes the decision. A further three justices are aged 83, 80 and 78.

Currently the justices are balanced between the liberal and conservative camps therefore a Trump appointment will tilt the court towards the conservative side. Bindman points out that until one of the elderly liberal judges is replaced, the court is likely to retain its liberal stance on social issues.

However, Bindman says the 1972 Roe v Wade ruling that an absolute prohibition of abortion by any state is unconstitutional is “unlikely to survive a Trump presidency”.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll