header-logo header-logo

14 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trump & the Supreme Court

President-elect Trump is likely to have an opportunity to fill four vacancies in the US Supreme Court during his term in office.

And, unlike President Obama, he can expect to find his nominees endorsed by a Senate controlled by his own Republican party, Geoffrey Bindman QC writes in this week’s NLJ. Once appointed, Supreme Court justices are there for life or until voluntary retirement.

Following the death of Antonin Scalia, a conservative, in February, President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland, a moderate liberal. However, the Senate deferred the confirmation process pending the election, therefore it will be Trump who makes the decision. A further three justices are aged 83, 80 and 78.

Currently the justices are balanced between the liberal and conservative camps therefore a Trump appointment will tilt the court towards the conservative side. Bindman points out that until one of the elderly liberal judges is replaced, the court is likely to retain its liberal stance on social issues.

However, Bindman says the 1972 Roe v Wade ruling that an absolute prohibition of abortion by any state is unconstitutional is “unlikely to survive a Trump presidency”.

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll