header-logo header-logo

03 March 2021 / David Locke
Issue: 7923 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Trump’s impeachment: all for show?

41408
David Locke draws comparisons between the governments of the US and UK in their recent frivolous approaches to serious legal matters

The recent trial in the US Senate was a stage production more reminiscent of an English pantomime than a Broadway show. With all its synthetic rage and posturing, it had a little bit of ‘Punch and Judy’ about it. Yet these were quasi-criminal proceedings of the gravest constitutional significance, which could have resulted in a conviction with significant penalties, albeit not penal in nature.

The government in the UK has co-opted its own criminal code to indulge in a spot of grandstanding to grab some headlines, announcing a ten-year maximum sentence for travellers failing to declare having visited a ‘red-flag’ country. If the aim of securing compliance with COVID-19 quarantine laws is laudable, the execution is poor and condemnation has been stern. They might as well have announced a 100-year term for all the chance of any sentencing judge paying the slightest bit of attention.

The parallel between the jurisdictions is the alarming willingness of the governments to wield serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll